Over35andup

Throwback photo Curtis Sliwa , the Republican nominee for New York City mayor, is asked to withdraw from the 2025 race.  It’s part of a broader controversy in the chaotic NYC mayoral election , where wealthy donors and political insiders are pushing Sliwa to drop out to consolidate anti-progressive votes behind former Governor Andrew Cuomo (running as an independent). Sliwa, the founder of the Guardian Angels vigilante group, has staunchly refused, accusing billionaires of trying to “buy” the election and emphasizing voter choice over elite influence. Key Players and Context Curtis Sliwa (Republican Nominee) : A 71-year-old radio host and street safety advocate, Sliwa is polling in the mid-teens but has no realistic path to victory in heavily Democratic NYC. He’s framed his refusal to exit as a stand against billionaire meddling , saying, “I trust the people, I don’t trust the billionaires.” 1 He claims to have rejected multiple bribe offers—up to $10 million in cash or jobs...

  As talk of a government shutdown grows louder, many Americans are asking how programs like SNAP—the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program —could be affected. Some have connected these funding threats to Project 2025, a conservative policy agenda that calls for major changes to federal safety-net programs.  While the project doesn’t explicitly promote shutting down the government, it does outline plans to restrict SNAP eligibility and reduce benefits. In this post, we’ll unpack what Project 2025 actually says about food assistance, what’s happening with SNAP funding right now, and what these developments could mean for families across the country. Food is essential to everyone.  Some elements of Project 2025 align with proposals to  cut or restrict  the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program ( SNAP ) benefits, though it’s  not  accurate to say the project explicitly advocates “shutting down the government” to cut SNAP in the official languag...

He got The Job done. Lyndon B. Johnson (LBJ), the 36th U.S. president (1963–1969), is often described as “crazy” in historical accounts and popular discourse due to a mix of his intense, erratic personality traits, vulgar behavior, and the high-stakes pressures of his administration—particularly the Vietnam War . This perception isn’t a formal clinical diagnosis but stems from eyewitness accounts by aides, journalists, and biographers who portrayed him as a domineering, unpredictable figure whose “eccentricities” bordered on the unhinged. Below, I’ll break down the main reasons, drawing from well-documented sources. 1. Intense and Manipulative “Treatment” Style Johnson was infamous for his overwhelming persuasive tactics, dubbed “ The Treatment ” by journalists like Rowland Evans and Robert Novak . This involved invading personal space, bombarding targets with rapid-fire arguments, emotional outbursts (from tears to threats), and pulling out endless memos or clippings from his pocket...